🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.